By Miranda, Nursing Student (BSN candidate)

This guide is currently pending review by a licensed clinical nurse.

Last updated: April 11, 2026

SBAR for Clinical (Med-Surg) Nursing: A Complete Example

Your first clinical handoff is in 2 hours, and you may wonder how much detail to include. You have 12 hours of vitals, two IV sites, a wound vac, a Foley, intake and output numbers, and a pain management episode that occurred at 0300 - all of which you must fit into a 3-minute SBAR. I understand that feeling. My first med-surg handoff lasted eight minutes, and the oncoming nurse interrupted me twice to ask what I was truly worried about. This page outlines how clinical SBAR differs from other specialties, what to include, what to cut, and provides a full annotated example for you to model your handoff on.

Video coming soon — subscribe to be notified when new episodes drop.

Why This Matters

Regulatory bodies: The Joint Commission, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Handoff communication failures remain the leading root cause of sentinel events reported to The Joint Commission. On med-surg units, the volume of quantitative data - vitals every four hours, labs, I&Os, wound assessments, and medication changes - makes structured handoffs even more critical. Without a framework, clinical handoffs become data dumps that bury actual concerns under twelve hours of numbers. The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals explicitly require standardized handoff communication, and CMS Conditions of Participation mandate hospitals to implement policies for safe transitions of care. SBAR is the most widely adopted framework for meeting both requirements.
  1. National Patient Safety Goals - Hand-off CommunicationThe Joint Commission (2025)
  2. SBAR Tool: Situation-Background-Assessment-RecommendationInstitute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) (2024)

How Clinical SBAR Differs from Psych SBAR

The SBAR framework is identical across specialties - four sections, same order, same purpose. What changes is the type of data you plug into each section. Psychiatric SBAR is observational: mental status findings, behavioral observations, safety status, and therapeutic response. Clinical SBAR is quantitative: vital signs with trends, lab values, assessment findings, wound and device status, and intake/output balances. The practical difference shows up in Background. On a psych unit, Background might be: "Patient was admitted three days ago with MDD and passive SI. He attended group this morning and his mood has been brighter since yesterday." On a med-surg unit, Background sounds like: "Mr. Yamamoto is post-op day 2 from a right total hip arthroplasty. His 0600 vitals were BP 132/78, HR 84, temp 98.6, and his hemoglobin came back at 10.2, down from 11.4 yesterday. Surgical site is clean and dry with intact staples, JP drain output was 45 mL sanguineous over the last 8 hours." The temptation on clinical units is to include every data point from the shift. That makes Background too long and buries the actual concern. The rule is the same as any SBAR: only include the data the listener needs to understand the Situation and act on your Recommendation. If you are handing off a stable post-op patient with no concerns, Background can be shorter. If you are calling the surgeon about a new fever, Background should include the trend line that supports your concern - and nothing else.
Trending distinguishes a useful clinical SBAR from mere data recitation. A single vital sign represents a fact. Two vital signs allow for comparison. Three or more vital signs indicate a trend, and trends drive clinical decisions. When reporting vital signs in SBAR, always include baseline, trajectory, and current values. "BP is 148/92" conveys little information. In contrast, "BP was 128/76 at 0600, 136/84 at 1000, and is now 148/92 at 1400 - it has been trending up all shift" reveals a pattern that requires attention. The same principle applies to temperature, heart rate, pain scores, and oxygen saturation. Trending also applies to lab results. A hemoglobin of 10.2 is not alarming in isolation. However, a hemoglobin that dropped from 12.8 on admission to 11.4 yesterday and then to 10.2 this morning in a post-surgical patient tells a different story. The trend enhances the credibility of your Assessment: "I am concerned about a slow surgical bleed because the hemoglobin has dropped 2.6 points over 48 hours despite adequate hydration." For pain, report the trajectory rather than just the current score. "Pain is 6/10" lacks context. Instead, say, "Pain was controlled at 3/10 through the night with scheduled Tylenol, spiked to 8/10 at 0300 when he attempted to reposition, responded to IV morphine 2 mg down to 4/10 within 30 minutes, and is currently 5/10 with moderate discomfort on movement." This informs the oncoming nurse exactly what to expect and what interventions have already been attempted. The NurseChartingPro app captures vitals at each charting interval, ensuring trends are available when generating the SBAR. Even when providing SBAR manually, train yourself to think in trends: where were we, where are we now, and in which direction are we heading.

Wound, IV, and Device Status

Med-surg patients often have surgical sites, IV lines, drains, catheters, and other devices that should be included in your SBAR when relevant to the clinical picture or oncoming shift management. For surgical sites, document the current status and any changes: "Surgical site right hip - incision clean, dry, and intact with 18 staples. No erythema, drainage, or dehiscence. Dressing last changed at 0800." If a change occurred since the previous shift, flag it: "New serous drainage noted at the inferior aspect of the incision that was not present at 0600." For IV access, include the site, gauge, date placed, and current infusion: "20-gauge PIV in the left forearm, placed yesterday, site without redness or swelling, currently running NS at 75 mL/hr." If the patient has a central line, include the type and number of lumens in use. If an IV is due for a site change or shows early signs of infiltration, flag that for the oncoming nurse. Drains and catheters follow the same pattern: type, output volume and character over your shift, and any changes. "JP drain right hip - 45 mL sanguineous output over 8 hours, down from 80 mL last shift. Foley in place, urine clear yellow, 350 mL output over 8 hours." Not every device needs to appear in every SBAR. If the patient has a stable Foley with normal output that is not related to any current concern, a brief mention suffices. However, if the Foley output dropped from 200 mL to 50 mL over 4 hours, that trend deserves a prominent place in your SBAR. Context determines relevance.

Medical Escalation via SBAR

SBAR was designed for escalation before it was adapted for shift handoffs. Calling the physician at 0200 is where the framework earns its keep - and where students feel the most pressure to get it right. The key difference between a handoff SBAR and an escalation SBAR is urgency and focus. In a handoff, you are providing a complete picture of the patient for the oncoming nurse. In an escalation, you are reporting a specific concern and making a specific ask. The physician does not need the patient's full history at 2 AM - they need to know what changed, why you are concerned, and what you want them to do about it. Lead with Situation. "This is Sarah on 4-North. I am calling about Mr. Yamamoto in Room 508. He is post-op day 2 from a right hip replacement and I am calling because his temperature just spiked to 101.8 and he is tachycardic at 112." That is Situation. You have not said "good evening" or recited the admission diagnosis or apologized for calling late. You have told them who, what, and why in 15 seconds. Background for an escalation call should be tight: only the information the physician needs to make a decision. "He was afebrile all day. Last temp at 2200 was 98.8. He has a JP drain in place and a 20-gauge PIV in the left forearm that was placed yesterday. Surgical site is clean and dry with no new drainage. WBC from this morning was 9.2. He received cefazolin peri-operatively and the last dose was 24 hours ago." Assessment is where you share your clinical thinking: "I am concerned about a possible post-operative infection - the fever is new, he is tachycardic, and he is 48 hours out from surgery which is the typical window for surgical site infections." This is not a diagnosis - it is your clinical judgment, and the physician needs to hear it. Recommendation: "I would like to get blood cultures, a CBC, and a urinalysis before starting empiric antibiotics. Can you put in those orders, and would you like to come see him?" Specific asks. The physician can agree, modify, or order something different - but you have given them a starting point instead of an open-ended "what would you like me to do?"

Common Mistakes

Vitals without trending

Weak: BP 148/92, HR 96, temp 99.1, SpO2 95%, resps 20.
Strong: BP has been trending up all shift - 128/76 at 0600, 136/84 at 1000, 148/92 now at 1400. HR up from 78 to 96 over the same period. Temp was 98.2 this morning and is now 99.1.

A single set of vitals provides a snapshot. The trend drives clinical decisions. The oncoming nurse or physician needs to understand the trajectory, not just the current number. Trending transforms data into a clinical story.

No Clinical Judgment in Assessment

Weak: Assessment: BP 148/92, hemoglobin 10.2, pain 5/10, surgical site clean and dry.
Strong: Assessment: I am concerned about the upward BP trend and the dropping hemoglobin - down 2.6 points in 48 hours. In a post-surgical patient, I want to rule out a slow bleed. Pain management has been adequate but will need reassessment tonight.

In the Assessment section, avoid merely repeating data; you already provided that information in the Background. Instead, explain what the data signifies. If your Assessment sounds like Background, you have missed the opportunity for clinical judgment.

No Specific Recommendation

Weak: Before the shift change, I wanted to provide you with an update.
Strong: I recommend that the oncoming nurse reassess vitals at 1600 and notify the surgeon if BP continues to trend upward or if the hemoglobin drops below 10. Additionally, I would flag this patient for a repeat CBC in the morning.

SBAR without a Recommendation is just a data report. The whole point of the framework is to close with what needs to happen next - monitoring parameters, orders, and escalation thresholds. Make a specific ask.

Burying the Current Concern in Background

Weak: Mr. Yamamoto is a 74-year-old male admitted for right total hip arthroplasty. His PMH includes HTN, type 2 diabetes, and GERD. Home medications include lisinopril, metformin, and omeprazole. Surgery occurred two days ago, and perioperative cefazolin was given. He has a JP drain, a Foley, and a 20-gauge PIV. His temperature just spiked to 101.8.
Strong: Mr. Yamamoto in 508 just spiked a temp of 101.8 with new tachycardia at 112. He is post-op day 2 from a right hip replacement. I will give you the relevant background.

The fever and tachycardia represent the Situation - they explain why you are communicating. Spending three minutes on surgical history before addressing the actual concern wastes time and obscures the urgency. Lead with what changed, then provide the context.

Mr. YamamotoAge 74Right total hip arthroplasty, post-op day 2
fictional patient

Scenario

You are the day shift nurse giving SBAR handoff to the oncoming evening nurse. Mr. Yamamoto is a 74-year-old male, post-op day 2 from a right total hip arthroplasty. The shift was mostly stable, but he experienced a significant pain episode at 0300 that required IV morphine. His hemoglobin has been trending down, and PT came this morning for his first ambulation session. Discharge planning has started, targeting post-op day 4 if recovery stays on track. You need to hand off the full picture: vitals trend, pain management, surgical site, devices, DVT prophylaxis, functional status, and discharge plan.

Chart Entry

S - Situation: "This is Miranda, Mr. Yamamoto's nurse on 4-South. I am handing off Mr. Yamamoto in Room 508. He is a 74-year-old, post-op day 2 from a right total hip arthroplasty. Overall he has been stable today, but there are three things I want you to watch: a dropping hemoglobin trend, a pain spike overnight that needed IV morphine, and his first PT session went well but he is deconditioned."

B - Background: "Vitals have been stable - BP ranged from 128/76 to 136/82 today, HR 78-86, temp peaked at 99.1 at 1000 but came back to 98.4 by 1400, resps 16-18, SpO2 95-97% on room air. His hemoglobin trend is what I want you to know: 12.8 on admission, 11.4 yesterday, 10.2 this morning. He is not symptomatic - no dizziness, no tachycardia, no orthostatic changes - but the trend is downward.

Pain management: he was controlled at 3/10 through most of the night with scheduled acetaminophen 650 mg q6h. At 0300 he attempted to reposition in bed and pain spiked to 8/10. I gave IV morphine 2 mg per PRN order - pain came down to 4/10 within 30 minutes. He has been at 4-5/10 since then with moderate discomfort on movement. Next scheduled acetaminophen is at 1800.

Surgical site: right hip incision is clean, dry, and intact. 18 staples in place, no erythema, no drainage, no signs of dehiscence. Dressing changed at 0800 per protocol. JP drain output was 45 mL sanguineous over the last 8 hours, down from 80 mL the previous shift.

IV access: 20-gauge PIV in the left forearm, placed day of surgery, site clean without redness or swelling. Running NS at 75 mL/hr. Foley in place - urine clear yellow, 400 mL output over 8 hours, adequate.

DVT prophylaxis: Lovenox 40 mg subQ daily - today's dose given at 0800. SCDs on bilateral lower extremities when in bed. PT came at 1000 for his first ambulation session - he walked 50 feet in the hallway with a front-wheeled walker, weight-bearing as tolerated on the right. He tolerated it but was fatigued after. PT plans to return tomorrow for a longer session.

Discharge planning: case management is targeting post-op day 4 for discharge to a skilled nursing facility. Family meeting is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon to discuss rehab options."

A - Assessment: "Overall he is progressing on the expected post-op trajectory, but the hemoglobin trend concerns me - 2.6-point drop over 48 hours without an obvious source. He is not symptomatic yet, but if it drops below 10 overnight I think the surgeon will want to know. The pain spike at 0300 was positional and responded well to the PRN morphine, so I do not think it represents a complication - but he will likely need the PRN again tonight when he repositions. He is deconditioned and will need encouragement to use the incentive spirometer and do ankle pumps."

R - Recommendation: "Reassess vitals at 1800 and 2200. I would set a threshold of hemoglobin below 10 or any new symptoms - dizziness, tachycardia, orthostatic drop - as a trigger to call the surgeon. Keep the scheduled acetaminophen going and use the PRN morphine for repositioning pain. Encourage incentive spirometer use at least 10 times per hour while awake. SCDs on when in bed. PT is scheduled again tomorrow at 1000. And can you remind the family about the meeting tomorrow at 1400?"

Annotations

Situation - three things to watch:
Previews the key concerns up front so the oncoming nurse knows what matters most before hearing the details. This is the clinical equivalent of "here is what to pay attention to" - it frames the entire handoff.
Background - hemoglobin trend:
Reports three data points (12.8, 11.4, 10.2) across 48 hours instead of just the current value. The trend tells a different story than the single number. Also notes the absence of symptoms, which is clinically relevant.
Background - pain trajectory:
Reports the full arc of the pain event: baseline, spike trigger, intervention, response, and current state. This gives the oncoming nurse a clear picture of what happened and what to expect tonight.
Recommendation - specific thresholds:
Names a specific trigger for calling the surgeon (hemoglobin below 10 or new symptoms) rather than a vague "call if anything changes." This gives the oncoming nurse a clear decision point instead of leaving it to judgment under uncertainty.

Pro Tips

  • Give the baseline before the current value - always: Train yourself to say "BP was X at 0600 and is now Y at 1400" instead of "BP is Y." The baseline-to-current pattern automatically creates a trend, and trends are what drive clinical decisions. This applies to vitals, labs, pain scores, drain output, and urine output.
  • Report Pain as a Trajectory, Not a Snapshot: A pain score of 5/10 means nothing in isolation. What was it at the start of the shift? What triggered any spikes? What interventions were given, and how did the patient respond? The oncoming nurse needs the arc, not the number - especially if PRN medications were used during your shift.
  • Say "What I Am Worried About" Out Loud: If you cannot finish the sentence "what I am worried about is..." then either the patient is genuinely stable (in which case your Assessment can say so) or you have not synthesized the data yet. Force yourself to complete that sentence before giving SBAR. That sentence IS your Assessment.
  • Flag Anticipated Events for the Oncoming Shift: When the patient is due for a lab draw at 0400, a dressing change at midnight, a PT session in the morning, or a family meeting tomorrow, include these details in your Recommendation. The oncoming nurse should not have to discover scheduled events by reading through orders. Anticipating events ensures a complete handoff.
  • Do Not Repeat What Is Already in the Structured Documentation: The oncoming nurse can access the medication list, allergy list, and full vital signs flow sheet in the chart. Your SBAR should synthesize and interpret information rather than recite it. If you find yourself reading the MAR aloud during handoff, you are in data-dump mode. Instead, focus on what has changed, what matters, and what needs to happen next.

Chart smarter with Nurse Charting Pro

Structured assessments, AI-generated narratives, and HIPAA-compliant crypto-shredding — built for nurses who care about documentation quality.